Article by
Issue
Employment status disputes involving taxi drivers are nothing new as the long running litigation relating to the employment rights of Uber drivers has shown. However employment status is very much down to the particular facts of each case and the fact that some taxi drivers may have statutory employment rights does not mean that all will have the same protection as was highlighted in the recent case of Christopher Johnson v Transopco UK Ltd.
Facts
Mr Johnson had been working for himself as a black-cab driver in London for three years when he signed up to the Transopco “Mytaxi app”. In the following year he continued to earn the vast majority of his pay, over £30k, through the business he had developed. He did however earn a further £4,560.48 from jobs that came through the app. When his registration with the app was cancelled due to excessive cancellations he brought claims in the Employment Tribunal alleging breach of statutory worker rights.
Decision
It was taken into account that there was an obligation of personal service. However Mr Johnson was operating his own business and Transopco was a ‘client or customer’ rather than being his employer. It was relevant that his income from the App was less than 15% of his total taxi receipts, he had provided his services as infrequently or as often as he wanted, could dictate the timing of those services, and was not subject to control by the operator in the way in which those services were undertaken.
Key points
The finding that the claimant did not have statutory worker rights does not mean that previous decisions relating to taxi drivers’ employment status were wrong. The factual nature of the test for employment status, which involves consideration of things like personal service, control, subordination and dependency, means that a blanket rule cannot be applied to these type of work arrangements. Where one taxi driver using an app might be found to be a worker with statutory rights another might not.
Gateley Plc is authorised and regulated by the SRA (Solicitors' Regulation Authority). Please visit the SRA website for details of the professional conduct rules which Gateley Legal must comply with.
Got a question? Get in touch.
Meet our expert
Related Articles
-
News
Gateley launches Diversity, Equity and Inclusion compliance audit
We are proud to announce the launch of our DEI compliance audit, creating a one-stop shop for businesses to assess their ability to prevent discrimination and haras…
Read article -
Article
Debunking some common employment law myths
The world of employment law is fast moving and often complex, so it’s unsurprising that there are some commonly held beliefs amongst employers and employees that ar…
Read article -
Article
New Code of Practice on ‘fire and rehire’
On 19 February 2024 the Government published a revised draft Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement. The revised Code aims to curb unethical use of the pra…
Read article