If you spend any time in the world of leveraged finance, you’ve probably heard plenty of talk about “super senior revolvers” or “SSRCFs”. For some, these seem the domain of specialists, walled off behind legal jargon and technical clauses. As solicitors who’ve helped guide countless clients through the SSRCF maze, we are here to demystify the key points. Whether you’re a seasoned private equity hand, a banker or just SSRCF-curious, this article is for you.
What is a super senior revolving credit facility (SSRCF)?
A SSRCF is a class of revolving credit, which sits atop the repayment waterfall, meaning SSRCF lenders get paid before the other senior lenders if things go sideways. That position brings strict rules and a lot of legal fine print. Banks remain pretty much the only institutions that are able to provide revolving credit or other clearing/ liquidity lines, but the pricing remains tightly controlled and accordingly they are not particularly profitable. The super-senior ranking (as well as the hope of a wider relationship play and the opportunity to potentially be able to provide more profitable facilities) is the quid pro quo for bringing the commercial lending banks to the party.
The key provisions
- The SSRCF’s expiry (or “termination date”) is usually at least six months shorter than the main unitranche facility. This ensures super senior lenders are out of the picture before the rest of the debt matures.
- There may or may not be requirement for a “clean down” (where you have to pay down the facility to zero for a period), but lenders should consider it, especially for pure liquidity lines. No one likes a revolving door of perpetual debt.
- Lenders can “drawstop” (block further borrowing) if there’s a default. In smaller deals, any default may do it; in larger deals, it is likely that only significant (material) events of default will trigger a drawstop. On sponsor deals, lenders will often agree that rollover loans are permitted unless there is a Declared Default.
- There will usually be a standalone financial covenant just for the SSRCF, usually a much easier leverage ratio or a lower minimum EBITDA. If this is breached, it’s a major event of default that can’t be waived by the unitranche/senior lenders alone.
- Independent acceleration: SSRCF lenders need the right to accelerate the facility (i.e., demand repayment) if a material event of default occurs and continues unremedied (or unwaived by the SSRCF lenders). This right should match those of the main lenders, including the ability to direct enforcement of security.
Material Events of Default (MEoD): the greatest hits
Every facilities agreement including an SSRCF should spell out what is classed as a material event of default. The following are usually included as standard:
- Clean-down breaches (if relevant)
- Non-payment of amounts due under the SSRCF (possibly with a de minimis threshold)
- Breaches of the SSRCF financial covenant
- Failures in providing information (although 15-30 days leeway on late accounts will generally be allowed)
- Breaches of anti-corruption or sanctions clauses
- Breaches of the negative pledge (i.e., someone else is granted security ranking pari or senior to the SSRCF)
- Significant disposals without proper process or within capped thresholds (capped per disposal and a separate aggregate limit over the life of the facility)
- Insolvency events, especially relating to major companies in the group
- Breaches of the intercreditor agreement, unlawfulness or repudiation (a refusal to fulfil obligations under the contract or indicating that they will breach the contract)
- Missing required SSRCF lender consents for any amendment, waivers or where their express consent is required (for example protected SSRCF rights, any changes to the MEoDs or related definitions).
Caps and thresholds are crucial here and your solicitor can assist with the nuances around these.