In this insight we consider how to correctly include a ‘no waiver’ clause in security documentation and also consider examples of when these clauses have not had the desired effect.
-
What is a no waiver clause?
The aim of a no waiver clause is to prevent inadvertent waivers of rights from being given effect and to assert that if a party fails to take action in respect of a breach (or in the case of finance matters, a default), it does not lose its rights to take action in respect of any ongoing or current breaches (or defaults) or any subsequently arising breaches (or defaults).
-
What is a waiver of rights?
A waiver of rights occurs when a party to a contract indicates that it will not exercise a right or remedy against another party under that contract or grants the other party some concession. By inserting a ‘no waiver’ clause into the relevant contract, the intention is that one party’s failure or delay in enforcing its rights or remedies, following a breach of contract by the other party, does not result in the loss of those rights or remedies.
If, for example, a party breaches or defaults on a contract then the innocent party may either:
- enforce its rights and remedies under that contract;
- complain about the breach (but take no action); or
- ignore the breach completely.
However, if the innocent party delays its decision as to what course of action to take it risks losing the right to take any action against the party in breach.
The term ‘waiver’ essentially means a person giving up their legal, or contractual, rights whether before or after any breach of the term being waived. A waiver of contractual obligations will occur when one party makes it clear to the other that it does not intend to enforce its contractual rights or remedies, this can be done orally, in writing or inferred from the party’s conduct.
-
How can rights be waived?
- Waiver by contract (or deed) – if a party has agreed to waive its rights, the waiver is likely to be contractual. A formal waiver letter, deed or other variation agreement will be drafted and sent to the other party.
- Waiver by election – following a breach, an option is triggered and the innocent party can take one of a number of routes. Electing, or choosing, one of those options means that the others are no longer available. One of the most common forms of waiver by election is where the breach gives a party the right to either end the contract or to continue with it (a repudiatory breach). If the latter is chosen, the party cannot later exercise its right to terminate (see the case of Tele2 below).
- Waiver by estoppel – here, because of a party’s behaviour estoppel restricts that person from relying on certain rights or acting in a certain manner if doing so would be unfair or prejudice the other party.
-
What are no waiver clauses?
No waiver clauses are very common and in finance transactions almost all agreements will contain one; however, doubt still remains as to their effectiveness. The effectiveness of these clauses is of particular importance to banks and lenders, as when a borrower is in default the lender will want to ensure the appropriate rights and remedies remain available.
In Tele2 International Card Company SA and others v Post Office Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 9 the Post Office sought to rely on a no waiver clause. Tele2, a supplier of the Post Office, breached a contract but the Post Office continued to perform their obligations for a whole year before complaining about the breach and giving notice of termination of the contract.
The court considered waiver by election and said that had it not been for the no waiver clause, the lack of action by the Post Office would have amounted to waiving the breach. It decided that due to the inclusion of the clause, the delay in complaining about the breach could not be deemed to be a waiver of any rights to terminate the contract.
Tele2 appealed and the Court of Appeal overturned the decision, agreeing that the delay and the continuation of the contract did amount to an election, and also amounted to choosing to abandon the right to terminate the contract.
By contrast, in Prakash Industries Ltd v Peter Beck Und Partner [2022] EWHC 754 (Comm), in considering whether a delay in serving a default notice was so long as to overcome a no waiver clause, the judge said that the delay would need to be “exceptional” to constitute a waiver.
Considerations for banks and lenders
Borrowers will be in breach of contract if an event of default occurs and the lender should send a reservation of rights letter soon after becoming aware of the breach. Doing so prevents any conduct of the lender being construed as affirming the contract and therefore waiving the breach. This could prevent or delay enforcement of security, at least in respect of that breach.
No waiver clauses are essential in security documents and they are only likely to be thrown into doubt when the conduct of the parties is considered. Ensuring a breach of contract is dealt with efficiently and as quickly as possible is likely to protect the rights of a lender to remedy the breach. It would appear that following Tele2, a no waiver clause would not protect a lender’s rights indefinitely and may only provide a short window in which to act. It is the airline equivalent of remaining in a “holding pattern” until the aeroplane hears from ground control as to the proposed landing sequence.
Summary
A no waiver clause should always be included in finance documentation as a form of standard “boilerplate” provision but as there is no guarantee that it will be effective, lenders should still ensure that they are in a position to take appropriate action as soon as an event of default occurs. This includes sending a reservation of rights letter to the defaulting/ breaching party to protect the lender’s position or otherwise consider proportionate enforcement action (for example, accelerate a loan repayment, if appropriate).
Delaying taking any action could be deemed as affirming the contract and the lender’s ability to enforce its security will be affected. In some finance documentation, there may be cure provisions within a loan agreement that allows for the party who has breached the contract to “correct” their mistake within a certain number of business days once the innocent party has highlighted or complained about the breach, but this is unlikely to be set out in the security documentation itself.
Get in touch
For more information on any of the issues mentioned in this article, contact an expert below or meet our team here.