When it comes to words being subjective, few fit the bill quite like ‘banter’. The dictionary definition defines banter as ‘mocking, humorous or arch remarks made about people or things to expose their shortcomings and to make them appear laughable…’
What for one person might be a good laugh and sense of camaraderie can cause offence and upset to someone else. In the workplace especially, whilst banter can be used to create a more sociable environment and build rapport, given the mix of different personalities and backgrounds within teams, banter has the propensity to miss the mark and cause offence.
As such, workplace banter can cause a significant headache for employers and here we break down what risks employers face when banter oversteps the mark and steps they can take to prevent a hostile working environment, whilst creating a sense of community and camaraderie.
Equality Act 2010
If the banter someone is subjected to in the workplace relates to a protected characteristic, under the Equality Act 2010 (the Act) this could be classed as harassment, giving rise to possible claims in the employment tribunal for the employer and the perpetrator. Potential compensation for harassment claims is uncapped and will include compensation for loss of past and future earnings as well as injury to feelings.
The characteristics that are protected under the Act are:
- age
- disability
- gender reassignment
- marriage and civil partnership
- pregnancy and maternity
- race
- religion or belief
- sex
- sexual orientation
If any banter relating to these characteristics violates the dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for any employee who is subjected to the banter, is affected by it or witnesses it, then this may be classed as harassment. There is also a separate category for harassment of a sexual nature.
It’s worth noting that it does not matter if the perpetrator intended for the banter to have the effect of harassing someone. If the victim reasonably felt that it had the effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment, the test will be met.
It’s also worth noting that a harassment claim doesn’t necessarily need to come from the person being directly subjected to the banter. If it creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for other colleagues, this could also amount to harassment.
Additionally, there is no requirement for the individual to have made the perpetrator aware that conduct was unwanted for it to be classed as harassment. Even if the banter was only a one-off occasion this could still be considered as harassment under the Act.