On 11 May 2026, HMRC published its much awaited technical policy paper on the inheritance tax (IHT) pension changes being introduced on 6 April 2027 by the Finance Act 2026, when most unused pension funds and death benefits from registered schemes will be brought within scope of IHT. This was shortly followed by HMRC’s 18 May 2026 consultation on the regulations which cover how information on IHT and pensions will be shared between schemes, personal representatives (PRs) and beneficiaries.
What does the policy paper cover?
The policy paper provides important detail on how the new regime is intended to operate in practice and how scheme administrators (usually the trustee), personal representatives (PRs) and beneficiaries will navigate what will be a more complex post-death process. The paper is wide-ranging and covers:
- the overarching framework (including the “notional pension property” model, vesting, liability and administrative processes such as how schemes will verify the identity of PRs);
- which pension benefits are within scope and how they will be valued, exclusions, and exempt beneficiaries;
- information-sharing requirements between schemes, PRs and beneficiaries;
- the new withholding notice and direct payment regimes;
- the interaction with income tax (that part of the benefit subject to IHT and interest will not be taxed as income) and the lump sum death benefit allowance;
- what will happen if there are changes to the value of the estate; and
- a range of supporting matters including probate, changes to estate values, PRs obtaining a discharge from liability certificate and the application of IHT reliefs and payment options.
Core framework and scope
The regime is built around the concept of “notional pension property”, being the value of pension death benefits attributable to IHT with ‘deductions’ for the value of specific exclusions (dependants’ scheme pensions, trivial commutation, joint life annuities and certain death in service benefits).
For money purchase arrangements, the value of notional pension property will broadly reflect the value of the member’s fund that may or must be used to provide death benefits and includes cash balance arrangements. For defined benefit arrangements, it includes lump sums that must be or may reasonably be expected (for example, under an augmentation power) to be paid together with certain guaranteed pension payments, known as scheme continuation payments.
HMRC confirms when notional pension property is regarded as vesting in beneficiaries. For discretionary benefits, this will generally be when trustees exercise their discretion; for non discretionary benefits, when the beneficiary is identified. From that point, beneficiaries and PRs are jointly and severally liable for any IHT due.
The paper provides helpful clarification on the death in service benefit carve out. Broadly, the exclusion applies where benefits are payable in respect of a member in current employment (or other work) immediately before death. In more borderline cases such as career breaks, long-term sickness or redundancy, it is up to the employer and the schemes to determine whether the conditions are met.
Certain beneficiary payments will remain exempt from IHT, such as transfers between spouses and civil partners that are long-term UK residents. The Inheritance Tax Act 1984 provides full details.
A key practical point for trustees is that, although scheme administrators are not usually liable for IHT, they can become jointly and severally liable where they fail to act on certain notices (for example, withholding or payment notices). This reinforces the need for sufficiently effective and robust death benefit payment processes.
PRs must take reasonable steps to identify pension benefits. If they become aware of a scheme some time after death, they must still obtain valuations and beneficiary details. Schemes can ‘encourage’ members to maintain details of their pension scheme benefits to assist with identification.